The offshore casino industry does not survive through anonymity alone – it survives through motion. Constant movement of domains, entities, jurisdictions, and payment channels. And at the center of this motion, investigators increasingly find SoftSwiss infrastructure.
A whistleblower dossier submitted to FinTelegram describes a “corporate shell game” perfected by the RevDuck network. Casinos dynamically change ownership entities depending on user location, while domains redirect seamlessly to mirror sites. From the user’s perspective, nothing changes. From a regulator’s perspective, everything disappears.
Holyluck.com redirects Dutch users to Holyluck2.com. One version names Gem Limitada as owner. Another lists Zephyr Holding SRL. Older iterations referenced Yakadea SRL. Yet the backend—the games, payments, affiliate logic—remains consistent.
This is not accidental fragmentation. It is designed opacity.
SoftSwiss’s Affilka platform plays a key role by centralizing affiliate operations across brands and entities. When combined with SoftSwiss-linked payment solutions and MGA B2B authorization pathways, operators gain the ability to scale illegal market targeting while continuously shedding legal skin.
The Dutch market illustrates the consequences. Despite enforcement actions, fines, and geo-blocking orders, the same casinos reappear under new shells, new names, same systems. Regulators fine one company; traffic flows to another. The infrastructure never moves.
This raises a fundamental question regulators can no longer ignore:
At what point does a “technology provider” become an active enabler of regulatory evasion and financial misconduct?
